Money is the mothers milk of politics.
The United States is not a representative democracy, but a plutocracy.
Elected officials and aspirants spend much of their time raising money and, in turn, become dependent on those who fund them.
Can the link between big money and elected officials be broken?
Electoral reform. Can the United States stop the corrosive effects of big money by setting a maximum size on campaign contributions? What results of McCain-Feingold?
Do the free speech provisions of the First Amendment require that corporations be free to spend for the candidates of their choice?
Public funding. Some propose public funding of electoral campaigns.
Im drawn to the pull-only rule: rather than candidates buying vast advertising time, telephone banks, and lapel pins, why not confine them to their web sites and let each citizen decide whether to look at their messages or ignore them? Dont call me, Ill call you.
Is there a better way? And how could reform be realized?
[and see] Common Cause: Money http://www.commoncause.org/site/pp.asp?c=dkLNK1MQIwG&b=191979
[Political Design 2005.08.11 Post A05. Front Door Index: http://www.learnworld.com/DESIGN/uncategorized/❄-end-the-plutocracy/ Permalink: http://www.learnworld.com/DESIGN/uncategorized/❄-end-the-plutocracy/]