Saturday, August 23, 2008

❄ Georgia

Are any US public figures or ‘mainstream’ media asking whether Georgia’s Saakashvili was given a green light by US officials, White House intermediaries, or McCain intimates to attack North Ossetia?

Is there any evidence? Granted that the record shows mutual appreciation between Saakashvili and the current White House, and granted that McCain’s principal foreign policy adviser, Randy Scheunemann, has been a paid lobbyist for Georgia, is there any evidence that the White House or McCain’s entourage [a] had prior knowledge of the forthcoming attack? [b] had an opportunity to counsel against it but did not do so? or [c] encouraged the attack? I have seen no such evidence. Let that be absolutely clear. But the question must be asked because responsible analysts are asserting, without adducing evidence, that there was either an explicit green light or an implicit wink & nod. Here are two examples from the Irish Times, a newspaper with serious European coverage and a high reputation for journalisic care.

Lara Marlowe:

“[Condoleezza] Rice visited Tbilisi exactly four weeks before the war started, when some western residents of the capital suspect she gave Saakashvili the go-ahead. The French investigative newspaper Le Canard Enchâiné quotes French military intelligence as saying US advisers helped target Georgian mulitiple rocket launchers.” [Note 1]

John Palmer:

“It is unclear who is deciding policy just now in Washington and Moscow. The US state department reportedly warned Georgian president Mikheil Saakasvilli against attacking South Ossetia, but that was not listened to. However, vice-president Dick Cheney and the hard-core Bush administration neo-conservatives spared no effort to encourage Saakashvili before hand . . .

“The majority of EU governments believe the Tbilisi government, foolishly influenced by American neo-cons, fell into a carefully prepared Russian trap by launching its military offensive in South Ossetia. . .” [Note 2]

These two quotes illustrate reliance on ‘suspicion’ and ‘belief’, and even incompatible claims about US Department of State representations. This is not evidence. However, if Palmer is correct in summarising opinion among ‘the majority of EU governments’ then it is important to establish, as best one can, what actually did or did not take place. To say ‘did not’ reminds us of the enormous difficulty of establishing negatives in complex episodes.

The Question

Do you have germane evidence?

Addendum

On 5 September 2008 EU foreign ministers ordered an inquiry into the onset of the August strife in Georgia. Press report:

“British Foreign Secretary David Miliband and other EU foreign ministers said an inquiry was needed to determine who was guilty of triggering the fighting and whether there were any human rights abuses during the five-day conflict.” [Note 3]


NOTES


[1] Lara Marlowe, “Events in Georgia show Nato powerless to confront Russia,” Irish Times, 22 August 2008.
[2] John Palmer, “EU needs to find a way to close divide with eastern neighbours,” Irish Times, 23 August 2008. Palmer’s is an op-ed piece; Palmer is not an Irish Times correspondent. He is, however, former European editor of the Guardian, now a visiting fellow at the Sussex European Institute, Sussex University.
[3] Associated Press. International Herald Tribune, 5 September 2008. http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/09/05/europe/EU-Russia-Georgia.php

[Bruce Larkin’s Blog 2008.08.23 Post b01 Addendum: 2008.09.09. http://www.learnworld.com/blog/blog.html]

Bruce 6:57 AM

---